caiti
Well-known member
Some people on this forum have posted disrespectful and mean things. It's unnecessary and frankly, it can anger me immensely. But it's how they are communicating at the moment. As long as it isn't counter productive, I usually don't think much about it.
Some people here do post idiotic things, as well. Some of them are merely ignorant and others just don't have the same morals shared by most members.
Since written language relies solely on verbal nuances, the perception of someone's message can (but not always) be significantly different in each reader, depending on how it's read.
Not taking it personally and sticking up for yourself is key, like others have stated. If someone's response is malicious and does not help, tell them. If someone's response is malicious and does help, you can either tell them or ignore the maliciousness (to the extent you are able to) and only be concerned with the helpful bit. It is hard to deal with something offensive or hurtful, but it is easier to try and not take it to heart, at least for me. If someone is unable to do that, I don't think they should be belittled for it, though I know many members seem to disagree.
I am not usually a confrontational person, so I don't remember anyone writing any message to or about me I thought was contemptible, but not everyone poses questions or responses like I do. Someone else could post something with the exact same content, but written differently and receive a drastically different reaction. What is rude to some is not to others, etc. As long as everyone keeps that in mind and is considerate, there should not be any unnecessary arguments.
Like you said, everyone's time is precious. So members don't want to spend their time on a question that was answered while that answer is still accessible to the asker (via the search function). Yes, the asker would likely feel more comforted and accepted if they got personal responses but it sometimes isn't practical and can irritate people who are expected to answer them.
Some people here do post idiotic things, as well. Some of them are merely ignorant and others just don't have the same morals shared by most members.
Since written language relies solely on verbal nuances, the perception of someone's message can (but not always) be significantly different in each reader, depending on how it's read.
Not taking it personally and sticking up for yourself is key, like others have stated. If someone's response is malicious and does not help, tell them. If someone's response is malicious and does help, you can either tell them or ignore the maliciousness (to the extent you are able to) and only be concerned with the helpful bit. It is hard to deal with something offensive or hurtful, but it is easier to try and not take it to heart, at least for me. If someone is unable to do that, I don't think they should be belittled for it, though I know many members seem to disagree.
I am not usually a confrontational person, so I don't remember anyone writing any message to or about me I thought was contemptible, but not everyone poses questions or responses like I do. Someone else could post something with the exact same content, but written differently and receive a drastically different reaction. What is rude to some is not to others, etc. As long as everyone keeps that in mind and is considerate, there should not be any unnecessary arguments.
Like you said, everyone's time is precious. So members don't want to spend their time on a question that was answered while that answer is still accessible to the asker (via the search function). Yes, the asker would likely feel more comforted and accepted if they got personal responses but it sometimes isn't practical and can irritate people who are expected to answer them.