While I know that many reputable ranchers and hobby breeders have made a few exceptions when it comes to breeding unpedigreed animals (among other hard and fast "rules" to breeding) - I worry that newbie breeders will walk away from this thread thinking that it's okay as a common practice because the big guys have done it.
The big guys are the big guys for a reason. They know how to pick out quality, they have years and years of experience, and they follow through with their offspring. They will cull when problems surface, they maintain records and within a generation or two, the offspring are fully pedigreed.
Rhonda, I do remember meeting you at the Atlantic Chapter Show and I do not doubt you have every intention of following through with your lines and bringing them to show and culling when necessary. But I worry about the lurkers out there in the vast interspace who are not members of this forum but reading this thread anyway - the ones that are now reading oh hey pedigrees aren't that important, so they will get their hands on all the rescues and rehomes they can, breed for two minutes, then release their unpedigreed herd to the next fly-by-night breader. And so goes the war.
As with absolutely anything, I believe you need to show you know the rules before you can get away with breaking them. Nobody will question what Shoots or Ritterspach has done, but as someone who hasn't even produced their first litter yet, you need to be prepared to justify your decisions as a breeder because you don't have the experience and track record that they do. But you do seem up to that task.
That all said, what has really bothered me about the mom and dad in question is that the breeder they originally came from sold opposite-sex kits to a pet owner, which makes me question how "reputable" that breeder really is. Even if Jared intended to be a breeder and this breeder was starting him out with a pair, they should not have sold him kits...