First cut vs. second or third cut hay?

Chinchilla & Hedgehog Pet Forum

Help Support Chinchilla & Hedgehog Pet Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Chinchilla63

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
126
Location
New York
I'm confused by all the choices.
I've been using the Oxbow Timothy hay. I read the other posts about the variable quality of Oxbow hay with interest, because when I opened a new bag it seems much coarser than the other bags I've gotten. It smells fine, does have some brown bits, but the chins don't seem to like it. They're suddenly picking through the hay piles and tossing a lot of it out of the cage. I checked out some of the other suppliers you all mentioned, and now I have the choice of first cut, second cut, meadow/Timothy mix, etc...
I know Timothy is supposed to be their main hay. Does it matter which cut? They seem to prefer the finer hay, but I don't know if it's as good for them.
Thanks for any advice!
 
From www.rabbit.org Hope it helps.



First Cutting: The first growth off of a field for the year is the "first cutting." Many people erroneously feel that first cutting hay is not to be considered as good feed. We tend to disagree, provided it is of good quality and was cut when relatively immature (pre-bloom stage), before the plant is allowed to mature to the point where the stem becomes larger and coarser. This is when the lignin (an indigestible part of the fiber component associated with cellulose and hemicellulose in the cell wall) content has become sufficiently high so as to make the hay more unpalatable and indigestible and the nutritive value has declined greatly. This can happen with 1st, 2nd, or any cutting of hay if left growing too long.

Second Cutting: Depending upon the temperatures of the days and nights, it typically takes 40-45 days for regrowth of alfalfa, mix hay, and orchardgrass , and 55- 60 days for regrowth of timothy. This is termed the "second cutting," which usually has a larger percentage of leaves to stems, has a finer and softer stem, has increased percentages of crude protein and crude fat, and has a lower crude fiber percentage (depending upon the stage of maturity at which it was cut) . More non-structural carbohydrates (starches and sugars) and protein are in the leaves than in the stems. These starches and sugars are very digestible and make the hay higher quality.

Third Cutting: If the growing season is long enough on any given year, it may be possible to secure a third cutting. In regions that lie south of our location, the growing season is longer and hotter, making alfalfa the prime hay crop, and often as many as four or five cuttings may be taken from a single field.

The third cutting is typically very soft hay that is primarily leaves with very few small stems. While beautiful to look at, it can be "rich" (high in nutrients, having a high Relative Feed Value or RFV, and low in fiber). It is our opinion that third cutting hay does not contain sufficient fiber content to be the only hay in the diet of most rabbits. It can, however, be used in conjunction with a higher fiber, good quality, relatively immature 1st or 2nd cutting hay, and creates greater variety and interest in the chewing experience. We suggest that you feed the different hays at different meals so as to eliminate waste.

FORAGE QUALITY
The stage of maturity at which forages are cut (whether it be 1st, 2nd, or 3rd) has a major influence on the quality of that forage. Forage crops generally decline in nutritive value as they mature. As forage plants mature, it is typical for an increase in Acid Detergent Fiber or ADF to occur.
 
That was very helpful, thank you! It might be this was a poor batch of Oxbow hay because it does seem to have really thick stems. It's too bad ordering online is so chancy for stuff like this.
Lee
 
You also have more weeds in a first cutting than in second or third cutting.
 
Interesting information about hay.. I never knew all of that. I've always heard that second cut timothy was the best. Would that be correct?
 
Back
Top